tributehub

  • Full Screen
  • Wide Screen
  • Narrow Screen
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Follow tributehub on Twitter
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows
(1 viewing) (1) Guest

TOPIC: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows

So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #1

More proof our government is completely loosing the plot. Can you imagine this happening in any other developed country?
Would the French, the Americans or the Australians do the same? They are training aircraft, painted bright red, hardly front line bombers in camouflage. Aaaargghhhhh!!!  Read on...

The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the 2012 London Olympics because they are deemed "too British".

Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background might be "offensive" to other countries taking part in the Games. The display team have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide, but the Department of Culture, Media and Sport have deemed the display team "too militaristically British". Red Arrows pilots were said to be "outraged", as they had hoped to put on a truly world class display for the Games, something which had never been seen before. Being axed from a British-based event for being "too British" is an insult - the Arrows are a symbol of Britain .

The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas trade, as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over the world.

The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid was announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly spectacular.

It is to be hoped that common sense prevails.

If you disagree with this decision, sign the petition on the link petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012

Re: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #2

  • larry
  • ( User )
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 4142
Twats.
Be very very careful what you put into that head, because you will never ever get it out. Thomas Cardinal Wolsey (1471-1530)

Re: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #3

Well Andy, after searching the on line newspapers and sky news then checking the  Department of Culture, Media and Sport's web page I can't find a single word about this claim. Where did you read it mate?
Are we nearly there yet?

Re: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #4

It's everywhere Phil, but perhaps not important enough for the big news channels to bother about...yet...until they notice the size of the petition!
Example from up your way below and as you can see from my previous link, also on the 10 Downing St website.
www.tradingmanchester.co.uk/red-arrows

Re: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #5

OK, I know we can't trust everything 'The Sun' writes about, but they have picked up on it:
www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007421005,00.html

Re: So Angry (Part 2) - The Red Arrows 4 years, 8 months ago #6

  • -
  • ( Visitor )
I've just emailed the Red Arrows so we'll see what they say. There is'nt anything on the Reds' homepage but then again that's the MOD for you.
Time to create page: 0.47 seconds
You are here: Forum